MiMo-V2.6 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Pricing Comparison

Head-to-head token pricing, context window limits, and blended inference cost comparison between MiMo-V2.6 Pro (Xiaomi) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek).

Direct Answer Summary (3:1 Blended Cost)

MiMo-V2.6 Pro costs 2.1x more than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on a 3:1 blended token workload. MiMo-V2.6 Pro has a context window of 1050k tokens, while DeepSeek V4.1 Flash provides 1049k tokens.

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6 Pro

Input / 1M
$0.4350
Output / 1M
$0.8700
3:1 Blended / 1M
$0.5437
Context Window
1050k tokens
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Input / 1M
$0.1500
Output / 1M
$0.6000
3:1 Blended / 1M
$0.2625
Context Window
1049k tokens
← Back to All Model Comparisons